Even the free version will do Hyper-V backups, you do need to manually run them or setup a scheduled task to run a script, the paid version is kinda pricey for just one machine, about $1600 for the first year and to continue the awesome support and updates is about $300/yr.Įven the Free Veeam Agent for Windows would do what you want to do, just by backing up the whole server to a convenient file format and able to restore from running OS or from boot device. What I found was there seems to be nothing that compares with Veeam when it comes to:Įase of installation and configuration, yes, Veeam requires SQL express, but the wizards work, and you can always have Tech. When working as the IT manager of a local company, I spent a good amount of time on this backup issue, as well as investigating the best solution for a current client. In other words all solutions have a lot of Pros, but what about their Cons? Let’s vote, or discuss. They chose one product over another what I am interested in even more is why Much as I'd like people to share their personal preferences in terms of why
More lightweight and less resource hungry, also setting it up is faster.ĭay all that matters is the quality, reliability and results. Yet): I find Veeam to be a bit too heavy in terms of installer size,ĭependencies (e.g. Installed Veeam and Altaro on a test machine (but haven't really used any of them So hasĪnything changed in this battle since 2017?
However I haven't found manyįorums/posts comparing the two (or any other ones) from 2018-2019.
Maybe not by a huge margin but still a front Jobs being one of them)? Other aspects could be speed of restore/recovery,įront runner up until about 2017. In terms of reliability, ease of setup/use, feature availability ( scheduled Can people share their personal experiences
0 kommentar(er)
